As a formal IB personnel, i expected a lot of pragmatism in your article.  But its disappointing.

While i agree with some of your points about BJP and congress, i find that a lot of that is influenced by popular media makings.  Ofcourse, there is no alternative nationalistic media, and hence the media established facts have been influenced in you.

Now let me point out few things.

1. BJP needs efficient leaders and pragmatism.  Not muslim appeasement.  You are of the assumption that muslims have voted for BJP in the past and hence this time not voted for it, which is a wrong one.

2. Rahul baba and MM singh are popular only among urban middle and upper class voters who mostly do not vote.  But for the rural people, their local leaders matters most.

3. You comfortably discounted the possibility of election rigging and manipulation, with deliberate projection of Naveen Chawla, and suppression of the report on him by former CEC gopalswamy.

4. Mumbai attack exposed congress’s and MM singh’s passiveness and inpotency, but sufficiently covered up by media.  I feel, you failed to note that.  As a common man, it appeared that the investigation is directly by Foreign agencies rather than Indian Intelligence.  It mostly appeared that indian intelligence has become subsidiary of the american and british one.  There is no assertiveness or independance of operations.  I may be ignorant, but as a public, this is my opinion.

5. You mentioned about Kandahar.  But what about the foolish and idiotic lethargy of the congress, to allow media to telecaste live coverage of the commando action, and the naken ineffectiveness displayed by congress?

Overall, with a disarrayed BJP and heavy influence of foreign agencies and their funds towards congress, the election itself is a mockery.

A RSS aevak