Sachar Cream and Lost Indian Dream

Posted on | April 25, 2008 | 1 Comment

Recently a “right reactionary Hindu” Patriot’s Forum has filed a PIL in the Supreme Court challenging validity and legality of the Sachar Commission Report, which has recommended plethora of concessions to the “minority” Muslim community. Though the Constitution and the Legal system of the country are silent about the definition of ‘minority’ the governments in independent India continued to use the TWO NATION term to define the numerically lesser Muslims as ‘minorities.’ Religion has been the yardstick of majorityism and minorityism, as it were during the British raj.
Sachar Commission report has revived that bad dream of Two Nation.

The much publicised and criticized report has kicked up basic questions that are normally asked by- i. Statisticians, ii. Open minded historians, iii. The common Indian who have been kicked around in the name of secularism, frightening apparitions of minorityism, shameless vote-bank solicitation and reactions expressed thereto by the so-called rightist, reactionary and communal non-secular people described as Hindus. Such reactions are repetition of the bad dreams India experienced between 1876 till partition.

The derogatory manner the ‘secular leaders’ and some media persons refer to the Hindus gives a creeping feeling that it was better not be born in India. It would have been a heavenly bliss if the Hindu parents brought down their progenies on the sands of Arabia. In that case no one would have dared to put the stamp of communalism on them. They would have been born seculars.

Anyways, birth is accidental and one has to live with accidents.

Numerically lesser number of people professing Islam lived and ruled India for nearly a thousand years. Obviously they could not bring down the entire population of Central Asia and Persia to rule India. They could not covert every indigenous Indian. However, they did not feel the “minority” pinch. The moment the Mughal Empire was demolished and the democracy-practicing British rooted in, the Muslims started crying foul of ‘possible majority Hindu domination.’ They took refuge under the cocoon of ‘minorityism’ after jettisoning Indianism. They collaborated with the British for ‘minority-majority equalism’ and they are now being pampered by the Congress+Left+Casteist seculars as an ‘endangered community.’

The first communal award conceded by Minto-Morley Reform in 1909 was sanctified by the Congress-Muslim League agreement in 1916, better known as Lucknow Pact; which gave reservation with weightage to the Muslims. The entire historical context of reservation for the endangered Muslim ‘minority’ had ended with the partition. Muslims, who preferred to stay in Bharat, are Bhartiya Muslims enjoying equal rights with other Indians. Muslims who wanted to follow Jinnah had gone over to Pakistan. Those Muslims who had not joined Jinnah bandwagon were not minorities-they were Indians; at best Indians professing Islam. Religion should no more determine our nationality.
There were other Indians professing Christianity, Sikhism, and Jainism and of course the most hated right reactionary Hindus. What had prompted the Congress leaders and allies to stamp certain people belonging to certain religious faiths as “minorities?” Could not all the Indians be treated as “Indians”? What was the need for branding the Hindus as majorities? Could they not take up the entire socio-economic backwardness issue of the people as a whole and not single out the presumed minorities? Is there any evidence to prove that the ‘minorities’ were prevented by the majorities from attending higher education, taking up vocation and marching with the rest of the country? ‘Abstainism’ was the policy of the Muslims during British days and it continues to day. This is a mass psychological process instilled by the ulamas and separatist politicians. The ‘majority’ cannot be blamed for this. Can quotas alone end this psychology of ‘abstainism’?

However, the NPA coalition drummed up a Commission to divide the country again on communal lines by providing reservation to the Muslims. Do they want to push India back to 1909 and drag the Indians through the process of another Lucknow Pact and another partition? This is nothing but repeat rape of Indian history by the vote hungry political parties.

A globalised India, the ‘reservation’ protagonists feel, cannot progress unless it is pushed back over 100 years in history to start again the great communal wars leading to another partition. It is suffocating to live with doctored, sponsored and inspired Commission Reports which start from the conclusion and try to fit the data to justify the conclusion already taken by the Quota Ministers and Secular Quixotes.

A close study of the Sachar report would bring out the incongruities which tilt heavily in favour of a particular community. It is as scandalising as the 1909 reforms and the so called Lucknow Pact. Incongruities of the Sachar report are revealed by the following simple observations:

1. A statistical study meant for social and economic reforms is carried out in the backdrop of total social canvas. Sachar focused only on a single community. He did not compare the parallel socio economic conditions against a vast canvas. While studying the socio-economic and political status of a single community professing a particular religion it is mandatory to compare their conditions with the people of other communities professing different religious faith but languishing under similar socio-economic and political backwardness.

2. It is mandatory to give consideration to proportionate equivocation and proportionate equi-evaluation taking into consideration the mathematical formula that X quantity of people of one community should be compared with the X quantity of people of the other community living under similar conditions. Equating X samples (say Muslims) with Y sample (say rest of the Indians) is a scientific folly that can lead to conclusion that the universe is earth-centric. Any student of statistics would shot down Sachar report with disdain.

3. For example: it was mandatory to make comparative evaluation of landless peasants amongst the given quantity of Muslims and landless peasants amongst the same quantity of people of other communities. What conclusion should be drawn if landless peasants amongst the Hindu community stand at X50 (amongst a population of 80 crore) and X5 amongst the Muslims (out of 15 crore)? Are the Muslims discriminated? That would be a pre-determined conclusion. The right conclusion would be: landlessness is a national phenomenon both amongst Hindus and Muslims (Hindus more in quantity) and require immediate action by the Union and the State governments. No political party and their expert economists have argued on this line. All arguments are branded as acts of communalism.

4. Let us take the case of unemployment. The figure amongst the people professing Islam say is Y5. The Hindu figure may be Y50. What is the justification to shout that special funds are necessary to generate employment to the endangered species called Muslim Minority? What about the unemployed people amongst other religious faiths? Who sheds tears for them? If some one raise this issue will be branded as Right Reactionary Non-Secular Hindu Communalist.

5. One more incongruity in the Sachar perfidy should be cited. It says that quantum of modern education amongst the “secular” Muslims is Z3. However, the great judicial mind of Sachar has not taken into consideration that amongst the Hindus and others in Bharat lack of modern education is about Z 35. While Quota Congress is howling like near extinct vultures the Secular Quixotes have forgotten to mention that lack of higher modern education among the Hindus and other under privileged non-Muslim people also require special funding and drive. Defying all these scientific methodologies the NPA government has announced special scholarship only for the minority students.

In fact, page after page, chapter after chapter one can perforate burning holes into the tailored report that was prepared to fit into the reverse historical thrust of the Great Secular Thekedars of Bharat- the endangered Congress and its political tails – the Left and Caste barons.

Are the people of India being prepared by the Secular Quixotic Congress and Quota votaries for several rounds of “direct action” of the kind taught by Jinnah? How many wars? Hindu-Muslim? Upper Caste> OBC>SC>ST and what else? Is India being turned as a perpetual battle ground? Who would save India from the Secular Quixotes? They are driving dagger into the national soul to divide and rule perpetually.

The dream of One India One Nation- after Jinnah walked out with his own empire and the British escaped has remained unfulfilled. The Hindus are honoured with the huge honorific of Right Reactionary No-Secular Communalists. A time has come to decide and act. We the People of India, irrespective of religion and other diversities should decide to finally cry out: We are united Indians. Oh the great Indian National Congress, the Jurassic Leftists and Caste Lichens do not divide us, do not make us fight communal wars! Our religion should no mote decide our nationality.

Category: Articles

Comments

One Response to “Sachar Cream and Lost Indian Dream”

Rajesh
June 2nd, 2008 @ 4:04 pm

Sir,

It was interesting to go through the article. I agree with what you have said about Sachar Commission report. I also had the occassion to go through the report. On one hand this person has compared “Muslim minority” with “Hindu majority” and on the other hand he has tried to compare Muslims with SC / ST and has thereby has further tried to drive a wedge between SC / ST Hindus and Non SC / ST Hindus. Further, no where has this person taken in to consideration nor has he analysed the effect of the “Religion” of Islam on the backwardness of the Muslims. No where in the Report any analysis been done on the role of the Islamist who have used Islamic religion to keeping the Muslims backward and separated so that they do not assimilate with the majority and thereby lose their identity or lose faith in their religion.