Two, the issue of good governance rests on the integrity of the administration that should not permit the bureucrats to squeeze the system for their personal gain. This is a problem of trnsparency that reqires the regime to take issues of corruption seriously and methodically, so that the benefits of governance are available to peole who are not denied their entitlements.  Best wishes, Moloy.     

EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY!

George W. Bush continuously criminally stalked Margie Schoedinger to the point that she could not get away from it, and she committed suicide in desperation to escape: he murdered her.

“In her suit, Margie Schoedinger states that George W. Bush committed sexual crimes against her, organized harassment and moral pressure on her, her family members and close relatives and friends. As Schoedinger said, she was strongly recommended to keep her mouth shut. . . . Furthermore, she alleges that George Bush ordered to show pressure on her to the point, when she commits suicide” (blog of drizzten).

“One of those ‘very leasts’ [was] George Bush’s personal complicity in the death (murder to be precise) of my friend Margie Schoedinger in September of 2003. Determining the exact whereabouts and contacts of [then] president-elect George Bush on September 21 thru 22, 2003, should be entirely lacking in difficulty” (Leola McConnell—Nevada Progressive Democratic Candidate for U.S. Senate in 2010).

McConnell is correct: Bush applying pressure (continuously criminally stalking Margie Schoedinger) purposefully to force Schoedinger to commit suicide does in fact constitute murder where it culminated in her death.

Bush is a racist hate criminal and hates black people (please feel free to see my “GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY” blog). (Schoedinger was an African-American woman.)

BEWARE: If the president of the United States hates one—for whatever reasons—he can continuously criminally stalk one to the point that one cannot get away from it, and one ultimately commits suicide in desperation to escape. He can murder people in this way.

Bush is getting away with his murder of Schoedinger—with no sheriff, prosecutor, or court willing to uphold the rule of law.

Bush’s method of murdering Schoedinger cannot exist in a vacuum: he must have murdered other people in the same way.

Bush should confess, come out with the names of all of the people whom he murdered in the disgusting way he murdered Schoedinger, undergo execution, and accordingly find himself at the intersection where he would be free.

(There are thousands of copies of the information above on the Internet. It exists very extensively in all major search engines. Please feel free to go to any major search engine, type “George W. Bush continuously criminally stalked Margie Schoedinger to the point that she could not get away from it, and she committed suicide in desperation to escape: he murdered her” or “Bush applying pressure (continuously criminally stalking Margie Schoedinger) purposefully to force Schoedinger to commit suicide does in fact constitute murder where it culminated in her death,” hit “Enter,” and find innumerable results.)
_______________
Andrew Wang
(a.k.a. “THE DISSEMINATING MACHINE”)
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

You should also some time write an article on how different cults controlling people at grass root level create security problems and are used as tool of politics and diplomacy.

Regards
Arwinder Singh

you said in your comment that “Personally I am in favour of Two Party system and decimation of caste lords and regional satraps. One party left of the centre and the other right of the centre should be good for India.”

I feel that the greatest balance is always achieved with three variables instead of two. If we see the west – who have been able to come closest to best application of democracy on the ground – we observe that they did it by having two main parties but in case of India where the culture is so very different from the west I feel a 3 way balancing weight would be the best at the top. I have my own reasons for this apart from the fact that I see very strong reasons why during the evolution of our culture whenever the concept of gods was inducted into the human consciousness, a hiererchy was created that ended at the top with 3 gods Brahma, Vishnu & Mahesh. No single entity above them!
 
Looking at the top two parties you would see that our great leaders from both these parties have reached a point in their head where they cannot pay leaders from the other party even the basic human respect. A good example of it was when Dr Singh & Mr Advani were both uncomfortable with each other’s presence. To me my country has produced both these great leaders & I expected better from both of them especially since they have reached the heights that they have. I could contribute this to 2 party system where you oppose the same people from beginning to end. In 3 party system during the course one would definitely ally with the other parties sometime or the other & oppose the same parties sometime or the other. It would become more issue specific than people specific.
 
I can write thousands of other reasons on how the ideology, regional, caste and other factors would be balanced out with 3 party system.  
 
Anurag